Interdependence Between Law, Morals and Sociology

Authors

  • Andreea Corsei “Petre Andrei” University, Iași, Romania

Keywords:

Law, morality, sociology, social norms, legal ethics, interdisciplinarity

Abstract

The interdependence between law, morality and sociology constitutes a fundamental pillar in understanding the complexity of the norms that regulate social life. Although each of these fields operates with its own concepts and methods, they do not operate in isolation, but influence each other in a continuous process of shaping individual and collective behaviors. Law, as a formal normative system, has the role of ensuring social order and cohesion through generally binding norms, sanctioned by state authority. However, the content of these norms is often based on the moral values of society, which provide criteria of justice, fairness and legitimacy. In turn, morality exerts a significant influence on the legislative process and legal interpretation, even if it does not benefit from a formal coercive mechanism. Sociology contributes to understanding how legal and moral norms are received and applied in practice, analyzing social dynamics, the degree of conformity and the tensions between normativity and reality. In this sense, the sociology of law plays a crucial role in assessing the efficiency and fairness of legal norms in the concrete social context. Thus, the relationship between law, morality and sociology is one of complementarity, but also of dynamic tension. In modern societies, the balance between these dimensions is essential for maintaining a legitimate legal framework, functional and adapted to changing social values ​​and structures.

Author Biography

Andreea Corsei, “Petre Andrei” University, Iași, Romania

University Assistant at “Petre Andrei” University in Iași, Vice-Dean of the “College of Legal Advisers Suceava” Association, General Secretary of the “Order of Legal Advisers from Romania” Federation, Member of the Romanian Academy – Department of Sociology

References

Cotterrell, R. (1984). The sociology of law. Butterworths.

Durkheim, É. (1893). De la division du travail social. Presses Universitaires de France.

Durkheim, É. (1996). Regulile metodei sociologice. Editura Științifică.

Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Harvard University Press.

Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s empire. Harvard University Press.

Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The concept of law. Oxford University Press.

Kant, I. (1992). Metafizica moravurilor. Editura Științifică.

Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22(5), 869–896. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638

Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (1978). Law and society in transition: Toward responsive law. Harper & Row.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.

Rouland, N. (1991). Introduction à l’anthropologie juridique. Presses Universitaires de France.

Trifu, A., Terec-Vlad, L., (2015). Professional Ethics in Financial Organizations, Anuarul Universității Petre Andrei din Iași, Fascicula Drept, Științe Economice, Științe Politice, 16, 25-31.

Trifu, A., Juravle, A.I., Terec-Vlad, L. (2017). The Economic and Philosopjical implications of the Concept of Responsibility. Ecoforum, 6(1).

Weber, M. (1946). Politics as a vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 77–128). Oxford University Press.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society (Vol. I). University of California Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-18

How to Cite

Corsei, A. . (2025). Interdependence Between Law, Morals and Sociology. Journal of Research in Law and Public Affairs, 1(2), 14–23. Retrieved from http://www.epejournals.com/index.php/jrlpa/article/view/40