Review of the volume “Gender Image and the Choice of Conjugal Cohabitation”, by Gabriela Bran, Maria Irina Nicoleta Bătrînu, and Iulian Apostu (coord.), Etica Pro Expert, 2023
Keywords:
Gender image, conjugal cohabitation, social stereotypes, marriage, consensual union, gender relations, gender equality, contemporary cultureAbstract
The work Gender Image and the Choice of Conjugal Cohabitation, coordinated by Iulian Apostu and written by Gabriela Bran, and Maria Irina Nicoleta Bătrînu, analyzes the complexity of gender relations and perceptions of conjugal cohabitation in contemporary society. The book explores the evolution of the woman’s image over time, from traditional stereotypes to new perspectives on gender equality. At the same time, it addresses the dilemmas between marriage and consensual union, examining young people’s perspectives on these options. The study combines theoretical analysis with findings from recent social research, providing a comprehensive overview of the dynamics of gender relations and the influence of cultural norms on cohabitation choices. The work represents a valuable starting point for understanding social and cultural change from a gender perspective.
References
Apostu, I. (2016). The two dimension of infidelity. Postmodern Openings, 7(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/
0702.11
Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262001
Gubernskaya, Z. (2010). Changing attitudes toward marriage and children in six countries. Sociological Perspectives, 53(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2010.53.2.179
Jamieson, L., Anderson, M., McCrone, D., Bechhofer, F., Stewart, R., & Li, Y. (2002). Cohabitation and commitment: Partnership plans of young men and women. The Sociological Review, 50(3), 356–377. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/
-954X.00387
Nistor, P. P. (2023). Social work professional competencies and educational programs specialized practice. Theoretical analysis. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Social Sciences, 12(2), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenss/
2/93
